Check the product inputs
Confirm which product facts, images, and claim language were approved, and flag anything the video shows beyond them.
Example review framework
What a trustworthy product video example must show, and the standard applied before any example is published on Rolo surfaces.
A product video example stands or falls on whether what it shows matches the approved product information. Review starts at the inputs: which product facts, images, and claim language were approved, which context the video serves, and where the sequence simplified or omitted detail. Examples that invent product context are not published.
Confirm which product facts, images, and claim language were approved, and flag anything the video shows beyond them.
Note whether the example was planned for a listing, an ad, or a launch, and whether the framing matches that context.
Look for stated simplifications, synthetic sequences, and disclosure wherever the framing could imply a real experience.
Approved product inputs recorded with an owner
Commerce context documented: listing, ad, or launch
No invented product details, settings, or use scenarios presented as fact
Synthetic or illustrative sequences clearly disclosed
Limitations stated next to the output
No invented performance results, ratings, or client names
Examples use permissioned product material with documented inputs. Any synthetic or illustrative sequence in an example is disclosed as such, and invented product context is not published.
No. An example documents a workflow and its limitations. It is not evidence of sales performance, and unverified outcomes are never attached to it.
Examples are added only after the evidence standard on this page is met, including rights and consent review. Until then, this page documents how to review an example and what Rolo requires before publishing one.
Confirm the current product experience and access information before relying on a particular workflow.