Check the inputs
Confirm which product facts, assets, and claim language were approved for the example, and who owned that approval.
Example review framework
What a trustworthy AI UGC ad example must show, and the standard applied before any example is published on Rolo surfaces.
A video alone proves nothing about a workflow. A reviewable example records the approved inputs, the brief that guided production, the edit and review path, and the disclosure attached to any synthetic presenter. Examples that cannot show that context, or that lean on invented performance results, fail the standard and are not published.
Confirm which product facts, assets, and claim language were approved for the example, and who owned that approval.
Look for the brief, the edit path, and the review steps between the inputs and the final video.
Any synthetic presenter must be labeled as synthetic and illustrative wherever the example appears.
Permissioned source material with a recorded owner
Inputs, brief, and edit path documented alongside the output
Synthetic presenters disclosed as synthetic and illustrative
Limitations stated next to the output, not hidden
No invented performance results, ratings, or client names
Publication only after a rights and consent review
No example is presented as a customer result. Examples illustrate a workflow with permissioned material and documented context; they are not case studies and not proof of outcomes.
Unverified outcomes are never attached to an example. A view of the workflow and its limitations is more honest than an unsourced metric.
Examples are added only after the evidence standard on this page is met, including rights and consent review. Until then, this page documents how to review an example and what Rolo requires before publishing one.
Confirm the current product experience and access information before relying on a particular workflow.